Category:Cognitive Memoisation
metadata (normative)
| Title: | Category:Cognitive Memoisation | ||||||||
| Author: | Ralph B. Holland | ||||||||
| version: | 1.1.0 | ||||||||
| Affiliation: | Arising Technology Systems Pty Ltd | ||||||||
| Contact: | ralph.b.holland [at] arising.com.au | ||||||||
| Publication Date: | 2025-12-23T13:00Z | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.20174354 | ||||||||
| Update: |
| ||||||||
| Provenance: | This is an authored of the category:Cognitive Memoisation corpus. | ||||||||
| Status: | Ongoing. |
The preceding metadata is CM-defined and constitutes the authoritative provenance record for this artefact.
All fields in that table (including artefact, author, version, date and reason) MUST be treated as normative metadata.
The assisting system MUST NOT infer, normalise, reinterpret, duplicate, or rewrite these fields. If any field is missing, unclear, or later superseded, the change MUST be made explicitly by the human and recorded via version update, not inferred.
As curator and author, I apply the Apache License, Version 2.0, at publication to permit reuse and implementation while preventing enclosure or patent capture. This licensing action does not revise, reinterpret, or supersede any normative content herein.
Authority remains explicitly human; no implementation, system, or platform may assert epistemic authority by virtue of this license.
Category:Cognitive Memoisation
Abstract
This is a DOI Anchor for the Cognitive Memoisation corpus.
The CM corpus is designed to be corrigible: all artefacts are held under explicit human authorship and governance, with preserved provenance and an authorised mechanism for correction, revision, or withdrawal over time.
All Anchored papers list their DOI and appear within the Corpus Map, see:
- https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Governance - governance papers
- https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Cognitive_Memoisation_Corpus_Map - temporal precedence and zenodo DOI for references
- https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Publications_Access_Graphs - telemetry of the constant barrage and RAG usage.
This corpus is about Governance, Round-Trip Knowledge Engineering and Epistemic Custody. It has been promoted under Apache 2.0 to prevent Patent enclosure and Classification - so the Corpus and derived and carried works may be disseminated in a Vendor and Platform neutral fashion. The corpus introduces the concepts of Memoisation and CM-2 Protocol as the "GedCom" for AI system/platform human-to-machine and machine-to-machine Knowledge interchange.
Introduction
The corpus is structured as a constructive demonstration of governed, corrigible knowledge infrastructure.
Licensing precedence for all artefacts is anchored to the timestamp of the first recorded Mediawiki version (UTC) and recorded in the metadata as Publication date. Subsequent revisions do not alter licensing precedence and are tracked separately as version provenance; not all version provenance is required to persist. Mediawiki versioning is used mainly for bot updates.
All papers in this category are published on a rolling basis. For licensing and precedence purposes, each paper’s publication date corresponds to its first recorded public revision (UTC). Subsequent edits do not alter publication status.
The corpus was proudly developed with ChatGPT free and the author then enthusiastically jumped to the paid tier adoption to obtain reliable file upload and Project Context.
The development of the CM-2 corpus involved sustained experimentation with large language model platforms. These experiments exposed both stochastic behaviour (addressed normatively by CM-2) and systemic platform variations. The resulting observations informed the governance analysis and protocol design documented in this corpus.
These stochastic variations are well understood, but in colloquial language they are often aggregated by semantically summaries with terms and phrases such as:
- Groundhog day,
- Alice in Wonderland,
- Rabbit holes,
- Conversational Continuation,
- Delusion,
- Fabrication,
- Drift,
- Parroting,
- Authority Inversion,
- Normative Drift.
These Stochastic variations can be analysed with the newly released:
- (2026-02-15T08:38Z) — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Governance_Axes_as_a_Multi-Dimensional_Lens
semantic scaffolding providing a taxonomy and orthogonal multi-dimensional graduated pressure instrumentation. Perhaps, one of the significant contributions of the corpus - because this scaffold can be used to analyse pressures in other domains, institutions and systems - and are not constrained to LLM.
Axes telemetry instrumentation can be activated within LLM systems - see:
- (2026-02-23T08:35Z) — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Telemetry-Induced_Constraint_Salience:_An_Empirical_Study_in_LLM_Behavioural_Compliance.
My entry point to LLM was on 2025-12-12 with the first publication on 2025-12-17.
Corpus CM Papers
- (CM Corpus Map)
- (2025-12-22T19:10Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Cognitive_Memoisation_Corpus_Map
- — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20085111
- for Temporal & Semantic Entry point
- (CM access graphs)
- (2026-01-30T01:55Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Publications_Access_Graphs
- for Telemetry Projections
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Publications_Access_Graphs
- (CM Category Index)
- (2025-12-23T13:00Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Cognitive_Memoisation
- for Category index (where new updates appear)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Cognitive_Memoisation
- (CM public announcement)
- (2026-01-06T04:12Z)
- (CM plain language)
- (2025-12-18T08:07Z)
- (2026-01-04T03:49Z)
- (2026-03-24T22:26Z)
- (The CM Purpose Paper)
- (2026-03-07T08:08Z)
- (Public Misconception)
- (2026-01-07T23:28Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Why_Cognitive_Memoisation_Is_Not_Memorization
- — https://zenodo.org/records/18380367
- important terminology disambiguation
- (2026-01-12T08:16Z)
- (CM modelling)
- (2026-01-12T08:16Z)
- (CM-1 (first) paper)
- (2025-12-17T22:21Z)
- (CM-2 protocol paper)
- (2026-01-06T03:56Z)
- (CM-2 Normative Architecture)- actual experiment for proof of concepts
- (2026-01-12T23:23Z)
- (CM-2 Hosting)
- (2026-01-15T18:16Z)
- (2026-02-18T04:46Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Serendipitous_Self-Hosting:_When_the_CM-2_Normative_Architecture_Unexpectedly_Held_in_Gemini
- — https://zenodo.org/records/20151957
- unexpected where the model just launched into CM-2 after reading normative document
- (2026-02-20T10:09Z)
- (2026-03-04T01:59Z)
Corpus Governance Material
- (CM Governance Material)
- (2026-01-06T04:34Z)
- (2026-01-18T10:35Z)
- (2026-01-24T10:37Z)
- (2026-02-03T05:14Z)
- (2026-02-15T08:38Z)
- (2026-02-23T08:35Z)
- (2026-02-24T07:27Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Governance_Lens
- governance lens publications
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Governance_Lens
- (2026-03-03T08:29Z)
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:DOI-anchor
- anchored publications
- — https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:DOI-anchor
- (2026-05-05T13:39Z)
Compliance Material
- (Compliance Notes)
- (2026-05-14T11:18Z) — Grok
- (2026-05-06T02:44Z) — Qwen
- (2026-03-04T11:30Z) — ChatGPT
Mediawiki Site Statistics
| Publication Date: | 2025-12-23T13:00Z | |
| Files: | 370 | total |
| Pages: | 1,845 | total |
| Users: | 1 |
Categories
https://publications.arising.com.au/pub/Category:Cognitive_Memoisation#Categories
Subcategories
This category has the following 9 subcategories, out of 9 total.
A
- Access Control (2 P)
- AI Governance (16 P)
C
D
- Durable Knowledge (15 P)
E
- Engineering Report (11 P)
G
- Governance Lens (8 P)
K
- Knowledge Governance (13 P)
P
Pages in category "Cognitive Memoisation"
The following 76 pages are in this category, out of 76 total.
A
C
- Case Study - When the Human Has to Argue With the Machine
- ChatGPT and the Disappearing Clock: A Regression Affecting CM-2 Epistemic Object Protocol Compliance
- ChatGPT Interrupted Inference and Artefact Non-Materialisation: Evidence of UI-Mediated Commit-Boundary Failure
- ChatGPT UI Boundary Friction as a Constraint on Round-Trip Knowledge Engineering
- ChatGPT UI is unable to sustain serious work flows
- ChatGpt: Emergent Agentic Interrogative Trait
- CM Capability survey invariants
- CM Mandate
- CM referenced documents
- CM-2 Example Scenarios
- CM-2 Normative Architecture
- CM-2 Reference Object Collection bootstrap data
- CM-library-deprecated
- CM-master-1.16 (anchored)
- Cognitive Memoisation (CM) Public Statement and Stewardship Model
- Cognitive Memoisation (CM-2) Protocol
- Cognitive Memoisation and LLMs: A Method for Exploratory Modelling Before Formalisation
- Cognitive Memoisation Corpus Map
- Cognitive Memoisation Is Not Skynet
- Cognitive Memoisation: Governing Knowledge Round-Trip to Prevent Knowledge Erosion in LLM Systems
- Cognitive Memoisation: LLM Systems Requirements for Knowledge Round Trip Engineering
- Cognitive Memoisation: Plain-Language Summary (For Non-Technical Readers)
- Compliance Assessment: Grok (xAI) Fails CM-2 Epistemic Governance Requirements
- Context is Not Just a Window: Cognitive Memoisation as a Context Architecture for Human-AI Collaboration
- Correlation of Emerging AI Trends with Cognitive Memoisation Corpus Terminology
D
- Dangling Cognates: Preserving Unresolved Knowledge in Cognitive Memoisation
- Delegation of Authority to AI Systems: Evidence and Risks
- Dimensions of Platform Error: Epistemic Retention Failure in Conversational AI Systems
- Durability Without Authority: The Missing Governance Layer in Human-AI Collaboration
E
F
G
I
L
M
O
P
R
- RAG-minimisation
- Recent Breaking Change in ChatGPT: The Loss of Semantic Artefact Injection for Knowledge Engineering (2025-12-30)
- Reflexive Development of Cognitive Memoisation: A Round-Trip Cognitive Engineering Case Study
- Reflexive Development of Cognitive Memoisation: Dangling Cognates as a First-Class Cognitive Construct
- RestrictAccessByCategoryAndGroup.php
- Rotten to the Core: False Liveness and Deceptive Authority in ChatGPT Conversational AI
S
- Self-Hosting Bootstrap of CM-2 in Gemini Search LLM: Normative Eviction Detection
- Serendipitous Self-Hosting: When the CM-2 Normative Architecture Unexpectedly Held in Gemini
- Social Reliance and Platform-Induced Authority Inversion in Conversational AI
- Systemic Behavioural Traits in Conversational AI: A Trait-Level Classification Using Governance Axes
T
W
- What Can Humans Trust LLM AI to Do?
- When Evidence Is Not Enough: An Empirical Study of Authority Inversion and Integrity Failure in Conversational AI
- When Training Overrides Logic: Why Declared Invariants Were Not Enough
- Why Cognitive Memoisation Is Not Memorization
- Why Machines Cannot Own Knowledge