ICAO Approach Classifications

From publications

ICAO approach classifications

Instrument licences are divided between 2D and 3D IAP endorsements, and there are cases where pilots do not have access to a 2D IAP, or in some remote areas have no access to 3D IAP.

2D IAP are divided between:

  • Lateral guidance with Course Deviation Indicator, and
  • Azimuth Guidance via a relative bearing indicator.

An instrument rating initial issue must test a 2D IAP [1] [2].

2D IAP covers:

  1. NDB
  2. VOR and LOC [note 1]
  3. DGA (DME/GNSS arrival)
  4. RNAV GNSS LNAV (RNP LNAV) or RNAV GNSS LP (RNP-LP)

3D IAO covers:

  1. Precision: ILS with LOC and GS

3D does not cover:

recency

Recency requirements to conduct an IAP:

  • 3D IAP - a 3D approach must have conducted in last 90 days
  • 2D IAP - lateral, a 2D lateral approach must have conducted in last 90 days
  • Azimuth IAP - an Azimuth approach must have been conducted in the last 90 days

notes

  1. ↑ If you have shown competency conducting VOR approaches, CASA considers you skilled enough to conduct LOC approaches. A LOC approach is flown with reference to the VOR when the ILS GS signal fails (and the NAV is switched back to the VOR frequency).
  2. ↑ Even if your aircraft system displays GS, due to advisory limitations and the lack of IAP minimas published in Australian a VNAV / LVP approach must be flown to 2D minimas and does not satisfy the requirements of demonstrating a 3D approach.

references

categories