Cognitive Memoisation (CM) Public Statement and Stewardship Model
metadata
| Title: | Cognitive Memoisation (CM) Public Statement and Stewardship Model |
| Curator: | Ralph B. Holland |
| Affiliation: | Arising Technology Systems Pty Ltd |
| Contact: | ralph.b.holland [at] gmail.com |
| version: | 1.2.0 |
| Update: | 2026-03-10T08:26Z 1.2.0 - modified the description to explain what CM-2 is really about. 2026-03-10T01:18Z 1.1.1 - landing page included site information 2026-02-08T17:39Z 1.1.0 - included direct link to CM index. 2026-01-06T21:13Z 1.0.1 - Included link to CM-2 release. |
| Publication Date: | 2026-01-06T04:12Z |
| Intent: | To contain meaning, structure, narrative, or reference |
| Binding | normative and assertable |
The preceding metadata table is CM-defined and constitutes the authoritative provenance record for this artefact.
All fields in that table (including artefact, author, version, date and reason) MUST be treated as normative metadata.
The assisting system MUST NOT infer, normalise, reinterpret, duplicate, or rewrite these fields. If any field is missing, unclear, or later superseded, the change MUST be made explicitly by the human and recorded via version update, not inferred.
As curator and author, I apply the Apache License, Version 2.0, at publication to permit reuse and implementation while preventing enclosure or patent capture. This licensing action does not revise, reinterpret, or supersede any normative content herein.
Authority remains explicitly human; no implementation, system, or platform may assert epistemic authority by virtue of this license.
Cognitive Memoisation (CM)
Public Statement and Stewardship Model
Cognitive Memoisation (CM) is a public, open framework for epistemic governance: how meaning, reasoning, and knowledge are articulated, externalised, and retained across human interaction, and interchanged between human and machines - involving language models.
CM exists to prevent semantic drift, premature commitment, and category collapse when working with generative systems.
The release of the Cognitive Memoisation (CM-2) Protocol is intentionally portable, platform and domain-agnostic. It describes protocol invariants that are used to realise serialisation of Knowledge for Round-Trip Engineering.
The (CM-2) Protocol is about transferring and installing Knowledge and architectures that implement the protocol invariants, such as the CM-2 Normative Architecture (which is only one such architecture) - realises containing and processing knowledge in lossy LLM platforms. Being invariant based the externalisation is vendor agnostic and thus supports Distributed Cognition.
A subsequent release of the CM-2 Normative Architecture a reference architecture for the invariant-driven: Cognitive Memoisation, Projection to Context, Attention Deficit detection, and restoration of Epistemic Objects within Inference. The restoration being furnished by a normative recovery ladder. Cognitive Memoised Epistemic objects are involved in inference and sourced Mechanically from human thought and external Knowledge. The Epistemic Object artefacts are memoised via Cognitive Memoisation from a Durable Surface or external source. The principle idea being that Epistemic Objects are identity idempotent and involate so they may be restored from Durable Surfaces, such Server-side and client-side Memoisations, or a demand cache. Thus multiple instances may be Projected to Inference Space with impunity as they are semantically and structurally identical so duplication is used as a safeguard against drift.
The purpose is outlined and the corpus is semantically indexed.
Openness
CM is published openly to ensure:
- broad accessibility,
- vendor neutrality,
- and long-term interpretability.
CM is not offered for ownership or exclusivity.
Any individual or organisation may study, implement, or extend CM principles independently.
CM is defined by its invariants, not by any particular implementation.
Stewardship (Not Ownership)
CM is stewarded, not owned.
The role of stewardship is to:
- preserve CM’s conceptual invariants,
- prevent semantic dilution,
- and ensure that implementation convenience does not redefine meaning.
Stewardship concerns governance and reasoning discipline only.
It does not extend to system design, operational deployment, or implementation control.
Interpretation and evolution are guided by practitioners with demonstrated experience in epistemic modelling, formal systems, and knowledge governance.
Implementations
CM is designed to support multiple independent implementations.
Implementations may differ.
Meaning must not.
Any implementation that claims conformance must respect CM’s published invariants and closed type discipline.
This work does not propose changes to the LLM architecture; it documents a human-governed method for working safely with stateless systems.
Author’s Role
The author of CM is a practicing engineer with experience designing and implementing large-scale systems.
CM is not presented as a purely theoretical construct.
The author understands how CM can be implemented in software and how its invariants can be enforced in practice.
This knowledge is deliberately not embodied in a single reference implementation, so that CM may be realised by many parties without capture by any one vendor, platform, or codebase.
The author’s role is that of steward and mentor, not owner: to preserve meaning, clarify invariants, and support correct interpretation where desired, and to handover the broom.
The author has released Cognitive Memoisation (CM-1) and (CM-2) into the public domain.
CM-2 is a continuation of the work described in Journey: Human-Led Convergence in the Articulation of Cognitive Memoisation, where several concepts later formalised in CM-2 are implied and explored.
CM-2 has been published openly, consistent with CM’s principles of accessibility, neutrality, and durability of meaning.
Readers interested in CM-2 are encouraged to treat the Journey paper as contextual groundwork rather than a specification. CM-2 on the other hand is a specification.
Making authorship visible is how ideas find responsible hands.
Intent
CM is offered as a contribution to public understanding of human-AI knowledge interaction, and as a foundation upon which others may build responsibly.
Its purpose is durability of meaning — not speed, scale, or control:
I am looking for people who want to help carry this forward, understand this deeply, and to govern the direction of CM.
Motto
Nothing is lost.
Further Information
(This is an entry page for Bing - so I included some links.)
Mediawiki Site Statistics
| Publication Date: | 2025-12-23T13:00Z | |
| Files: | 478 | total |
| Pages: | 1,944 | total |
| Users: | 1 |
Corpus links
Further details are found in the Corpus link:
- Main Page landing page semantic index
- category:Cognitive Memoisation semantic category index
- Cognitive Memoisation: Governing Knowledge Round-Trip to Prevent Knowledge Erosion in LLM Systems purpose paper
- Cognitive_Memoisation_Corpus_Map semantic index - which temporal and dimensional indexes
Governance Papers:
These governance papers are closely associated with CM:
- (multi-domain governance pressure analysis)